Legal Opinion

Park Apartments At Fayetteville, LP v. Plants

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided May 17, 2018No. CV–17–723PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRhonda K. Wood, Associate Justice

Appellants', The Park Apartments at Fayetteville, LP, The Park Apartments at Fayetteville Management Company, LLC, and Lindsey Management Co., Inc. (Lindsey) (collectively "the Park"),1 appeal centers around the following issue: Do Arkansas's Rules of Professional Conduct require attorney disqualification simply because the attorney had access to client information but did not gain actual knowledge while practicing at her former association? We hold that they do not, and therefore, we reverse and remand.

*757I. Facts

In November 2015, appellee Shilah Plants filed a complaint against the Park…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Burnette v. MorganSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1990
  2. Norman v. NormanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
  3. Craig v. CarrigoSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
  4. Sturdivant v. SturdivantSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2006

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Tim Griffin, in His Official Capacity as Attorney General of Arkansas v. Arkansas Board of Corrections; And Benny Magness, in His Official Capacity as Chairman of the Arkansas Board of CorrectionsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2025
  2. Worsham v. DaySupreme Court of Arkansas · 2019
  3. Darren Taylor v. State of ArkansasSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2024
  4. Darren Taylor v. State of ArkansasSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2024
  5. The Travelers Indemnity Company and Stephen E. Goldman v. the Board of Trustees of the University of ArkansasSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2022

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API