Creagh v. United Fruit Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
CONGER, District Judge.
Plaintiff moves for a new trial, pursuant to Rule 59 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A., on the ground that the verdict of the jury in the above matter was against the weight of evidence and on the further ground that the court erred in its charge to the jury.
Defendant opposes, on the ground (a) that plaintiff’s counsel did not at the time the jury was charged or when parts of the charge were later read to the jury at their request, object to the charge or take exception to any part of the charge; and (b) that the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur, alleged…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Jesionowski v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- San Juan Light & Transit Co. v. RequenaSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Caldwell v. Southern Pac. Co.District Court, S.D. California · 1947
- Makane Kane v. American Tankers Corporation of DelawareCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1955
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Roy L. Compton v. Luckenbach Overseas CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970
- Talton v. United States Lines CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1962
- Reyes v. Grace Line, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1971
- Roy L. Compton v. Luckenbach Overseas CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970