Legal Opinion
Roddy v. Brooklyn Heights Railroad
New York Supreme Court
Decided April 15, 1898Published
■Motion in each action for an injunction pendente lite. Facts appear in opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtMaddox, J.
A motion is made by .the plaintiff in each action for an injunction pendente lite, i. e., in the Roddy case to enjoin the operation 'by the Heights' company of its cars, upon the tracks of the Newtown company on Washington street in front of the abutting premises of that plaintiff, and in the Schmidt case to restrain the operation by the Newtown company and by the Coney Island company of their cars upon the tracks of the Heights company, on Fulton street in front of the abutting property of Schmidt, upon the ground that the constitutional and statutory conditions, now in force, not having…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- People v. . O'BrienNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
- Colonial City Traction Co. v. Kingston City RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1897
- Matter of Gilbert Elevated Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1877
- In Re Rochester Electric Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Colonial City Traction Co. v. Kingston City RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1897
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.