Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Namer Investment Corp. v. Williams

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 5, 1968No. 38928Published

1Opinion of the Court

73 Wn.2d 1 (1968)

435 P.2d 975

THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, on the Relation of Namer Investment Corporation, Appellant,

v.

M.J.R. WILLIAMS et al., Respondents.[*]

No. 38928.

The Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

January 5, 1968.

Stanley B. Allper, for appellant.

Charles O. Carroll, James E. Kennedy, and William L. Paul, Jr., for respondents.

HAMILTON, J.

In the context of a mandamus proceeding, appellant (plaintiff) seeks a judicial declaration that the 1 per cent excise tax on real-estate sales and transactions levied by King County, Washington, pursuant to RCW 28.45, does not apply to unexercised…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. State Bd. of Tax Commr's of Ind. v. JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Brown-Forman Co. v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  3. Gruen v. State Tax CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Miller v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Greenough v. Tax Assessors of NewportSupreme Court of the United States · 1947

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API