United Land Ass'n v. Pacific Improvement Co.
California Supreme Court
APPEALS from orders of the Superior Court of the Cit;f and County of San Francisco denying a new trial. Walter H. Levy, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinions rendered by the court in Bank and by Department Two.
1Opinion of the Court
A rehearing was granted in these cases on the ground, as claimed by the appellants in their petition for a rehearing, that some portion of the land involved in the controversy lies outside of the pueblo patent line. Both cases relate to the same lands, and were submitted on the same briefs and arguments, No. 2021 being an action to quiet title, and the other an action in ejectment.
After further argument and a re-examination of the cases, we are satisfied the contention of appellants in their petition on this point cannot be sustained. The plaintiffs and appellants deraign title under two…
2Cited by10 opinions
- Williams v. City of San Pedro Etc. Co.California Supreme Court · 1908
- Smart v. PeekCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
- Weyse v. BiedebachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
- Bird v. MurphyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
- Harmon Enterprises, Inc. v. VromanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.