Legal Opinion

Adams v. Long

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided May 26, 1904No. Gen. No. 11,326PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Action of assumpsit upon promissory note. Appeal from the Superior Court of Cook County; the Hon. Jonas Hutchinson, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the October term, 1903.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Windes

In a suit on a promissory note, the appellee, as first endorsee thereof, recovered a verdict and judgment thereon, against appellant, from which this appeal is taken. The note was executed by C. B. Matson in the firm name of Adams, Matson & Co., and made payable to D. M. Evans, who, with said Matson, endorsed it. Evans and Matson were defendants, but were not served, nor before the court. The note is declared on specially, and in an additional count it is alleged that the note was executed in Missouri, and under the.laws of that state ten per cent interest is legal. The pleas were the general…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Wright v. BrosseauIllinois Supreme Court · 1874
  2. Deardorf's Administrator v. ThacherSupreme Court of Missouri · 1883
  3. Gould v. Magnolia Metal Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Gardt v. BrownIllinois Supreme Court · 1885
  5. Smith v. SloanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1875

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Heldman v. GunnellAppellate Court of Illinois · 1916
  2. Shaw v. GunbyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API