Legal Opinion

Cosgriff Neon Company v. Mattheus

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided May 21, 1962No. 4453PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

Thompson, J.:

Pursuant to a conditional sales contract with the Carson Shopping Center, the appellant Cosgriff Neon Company, Inc., installed and erected an electric neon sign on a brick pylon. On the day after such installation, the brick pylon collapsed. The sign was totally destroyed. In the lower court, Cosgriff Neon Company, Inc., by complaint in intervention, sought to recover the sum of $1,421.88 alleged to be the value of the sign. It was denied relief, the court stating, “That the Intervenor, Cosgriff Neon Company, Inc., has no privity with the Plaintiffs, or the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. MacPherson v. . Buick Motor Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1916
  2. Helen Hanna, Cicero Hanna v. Annie C. Fletcher, Trustee of Estate of Florence Johnson, Benjamin F. Fletcher, and Fred S. Gichner Iron Works, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1956
  3. Hale v. DepaoliCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Harris v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  5. Harris v. Seaboard Air Line Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1925

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Long v. Flanigan Warehouse CompanyNevada Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Kapalczynski v. Globe Construction Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1969
  3. Gard v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1976
  4. Bradshaw v. Blystone Equipment Co. of NevadaNevada Supreme Court · 1963
  5. General Dynamics Corp. v. Zantop International AirlinesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1985

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API