Legal Opinion

Banks v. Browning

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 11, 1994No. 2-93-155-CVPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HICKS, Justice.

Appellants are H.L. Browning’s children and grandchildren from his first marriage. 1 After H.L. died intestate, appellants sued appellee Ruth Browning, H.L.’s second wife, to recover community property monies on deposit in two joint savings accounts they alleged belonged to them as H.L.’s heirs. The trial court denied appellants’ motion for summary judgment, and granted appellee’s motion for summary judgment. In one point of error, appellants allege that the trial court erred in granting appellee’s motion for summary judgment and denying their motion for summary judgment…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Stauffer v. HendersonTexas Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Ephran v. Frazier, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1992
  3. Kitchen v. Sawyer, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1991
  4. Ivey v. SteeleCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1993

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of Wilson, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)2007
  2. Hare v. LongstreetCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2017
  3. Holmes v. Beatty, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2007
  4. Cummings v. CummingsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1996
  5. Harry Holmes, Individually and as Independent of the Estate of Thomas J. Holmes, and as Trustee of Any Trust Named as a Legatee in the Will of Thomas J. Holmes, SR. v. Douglas G. Beatty, Individually and as Independent of the Estate of Kathryn v. Holmes, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2007

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API