Legal Opinion

Boice v. Boice

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 15, 1952PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PEE CUEIAM.

Plaintiff brought action on two causes: (1) for money had and received and (2) for conversion of *347personal property. Defendant answered, setting np three counterclaims. Trial was had before the court without a jury. From a judgment in favor of the defendant in the amount of $500, plaintiff appeals.

Plaintiff’s sole assignment of error reads: “In finding for defendant-respondent in the face of a. total failure of proof of a contract as alleged in his counterclaim.”

We find in the record no basis for evaluating this assignment.

A transcript of the testimony, certified by the court…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Larsen v. MartinOregon Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Wallowa Law, Land & Abstract Co. v. McGaffeeOregon Supreme Court · 1938
  3. La Grande Air Service v. TYLEROregon Supreme Court · 1951

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. ReyesOregon Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Sheridan v. Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1954
  3. State v. ReyesOregon Supreme Court · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API