Boice v. Boice
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
PEE CUEIAM.
Plaintiff brought action on two causes: (1) for money had and received and (2) for conversion of *347personal property. Defendant answered, setting np three counterclaims. Trial was had before the court without a jury. From a judgment in favor of the defendant in the amount of $500, plaintiff appeals.
Plaintiff’s sole assignment of error reads: “In finding for defendant-respondent in the face of a. total failure of proof of a contract as alleged in his counterclaim.”
We find in the record no basis for evaluating this assignment.
A transcript of the testimony, certified by the court…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Larsen v. MartinOregon Supreme Court · 1943
- Wallowa Law, Land & Abstract Co. v. McGaffeeOregon Supreme Court · 1938
- La Grande Air Service v. TYLEROregon Supreme Court · 1951
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. ReyesOregon Supreme Court · 1957
- Sheridan v. Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1954
- State v. ReyesOregon Supreme Court · 1957