Legal Opinion

Parker Oil Co. v. Mico Petro & Heating Oil, LLC

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 3, 2009No. 399 EDA 2008PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

KLEIN, J.:

¶ 1 Mico Petro and Heating Oil, LLC and Kamal Singh appeal from the judgment entered against them determining that Mico Petro and Singh, personally, are responsible for the failure of the corporation to meet its corporate obligations to pay for oil supplied to it pursuant to contract. The trial court determined Mico Petro and Singh owed $80,790.38 in unpaid invoices, service charges and returned check bank charges. While we agree that Mico Petro is responsible, we disagree that Singh is also liable under the participation theory. Therefore, we reverse that portion of the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Wicks v. Milzoco Builders, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Skurnowicz v. LucciSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  3. Shay v. Flight C Helicopter Services, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  4. Harris v. Toys" R" Us-Penn, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  5. Herzog Oil Field Service, Inc. v. Otto Torpedo Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Accurso v. Infra-Red Services, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
  2. Johnson v. State Farm Life InsuranceDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2010
  3. Apex Comm. Federal Credit Union v. Arasin, S.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  4. Baudendistel, N. v. Macking, H.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
  5. Commonwealth Financial Systems Inc. v. Hill, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Montgomery County2010

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API