Legal Opinion

Kurtz v. Detroit, Toledo & Ironton Railroad

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 1, 1927No. Docket No. 73PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClaek, J.

This is an action under the Federal employers’ liability act for the averred negligent killing of plaintiff’s decedent, Edward J. Gall, yardmaster of the yard of defendant Detroit, Toledo & Ironton Railroad Company at Delray. The declaration has separate counts on common-law negligence against the Pere Marquette Railway Company.. Plaintiff was required to elect which action would be pursued and the election was against the Detroit, Toledo & Ironton Railroad Company, hereinafter called the defendant. Plaintiff had verdict and judgment. Defendant brings error.

Delray yard is the northern…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. ArchibaldSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  2. Baltimore & Potomac Railroad v. MacKeySupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  3. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. MerrillSupreme Court of Kansas · 1902
  4. Glynn v. Central RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1900
  5. Goodrich v. . N.Y.C. H.R.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1889

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Stephenson v. GoldenMichigan Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Chicago & North Western Railway Co. v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific RailroadDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1959
  3. Union Trust Co. v. Detroit, Grand Haven & Milwaukee Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Brady v. Wabash Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1932
  5. Ruiz v. Midland Valley RailroadSupreme Court of Kansas · 1944

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API