Legal Opinion

People v. O'Connell

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided November 29, 2007No. 102707PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Kilbride

Chief Justice Thomas and Justices Freeman, Fitzgerald, Garman, Karmeier, and Burke concurred in the judgment and opinion.

OPINION

In attempting to raise an actual-innocence claim, defendant, John O’Connell, filed a pro se motion for DNA testing pursuant to section 116 — 3 of the Code of Criminal Procedure of 1963 (Code) (725 ILCS 5/116 — 3 (West 2002)). The circuit court of Cook County denied defendant’s motion. The appellate court reversed the trial court’s order denying defendant’s motion for DNA testing and remanded the cause for further proceedings. 365 Ill. App. 3d 872. This court allowed…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Burke v. 12 Rothschild's Liquor Mart, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc. v. AldridgeIllinois Supreme Court · 1997
  4. People v. SavoryIllinois Supreme Court · 2001
  5. People v. ShumIllinois Supreme Court · 2003

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. O'CONNELLIllinois Supreme Court · 2007
  2. In Re CcIllinois Supreme Court · 2011
  3. People v. BaileyIllinois Supreme Court · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API