McIntosh v. State
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CRONE, Judge.
Case Summary
Laura McIntosh appeals the trial court's denial of her motion to suppress her statements to police. reverse in part. We affirm in part and
Issue
Melntosh raises one issue in this interlocutory appeal, which we restate as the following two:
I. Whether her first and second statements are inadmissible because they were obtained in violation of Miranda; and
II. Whether her third statement is inadmissible because the police used trickery and coercion to obtain it.
Facts and Procedural History
Meclntosh was eighteen years old when she was questioned by police about the…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Kubsch v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2003
- Taylor v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1997
- Ackerman v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2002
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- King v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2006
- Laster v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2009
- Sharon Myers v. State of FloridaSupreme Court of Florida · 2017
- Michael Scanland v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2019
- Sharon Myers v. State of FloridaSupreme Court of Florida · 2017