Legal Opinion

McIntosh v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided June 13, 2005No. 03A01-0405-CR-196PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CRONE, Judge.

Case Summary

Laura McIntosh appeals the trial court's denial of her motion to suppress her statements to police. reverse in part. We affirm in part and

Issue

Melntosh raises one issue in this interlocutory appeal, which we restate as the following two:

I. Whether her first and second statements are inadmissible because they were obtained in violation of Miranda; and

II. Whether her third statement is inadmissible because the police used trickery and coercion to obtain it.

Facts and Procedural History

Meclntosh was eighteen years old when she was questioned by police about the…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Kubsch v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Taylor v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Ackerman v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2002

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. King v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2006
  2. Laster v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2009
  3. Sharon Myers v. State of FloridaSupreme Court of Florida · 2017
  4. Michael Scanland v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2019
  5. Sharon Myers v. State of FloridaSupreme Court of Florida · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API