Legal Opinion

City of Paris v. Bray

Texas Supreme Court

Decided April 14, 1915No. 2399PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Error to the Court of Civil Appeals, Sixth District, in an appeal from Lamar County. The city sued Bray and wife and appealed from a judgment for defendant. On affirmance, it obtained writ of error from the Supreme Court.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Phillips

The suit was instituted by the City of Paris to recover the amount of a paving assessment, together with reasonable attorneys’ fees, for paving done in front of property of E. C. Bray (E. F. Bray being her husband) situated on a certain street in the city, and for foreclosure of a lien against the propery. A special demurrer to the city’s petition was sustained in the trial court, and the case dismissed. On the city’s appeal the honorable Court of Civil Appeals for the Sixth District held that the trial court erroneously sustained the special demurrer, but af firmed the judgment upon what it…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In the Matter of John G. LeedsNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
  2. City of Milbank v. Western Surety Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1907

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Southwest Stone Co. v. Railroad CommissionCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1943
  2. Carver v. GrayCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940
  3. Vogel v. Central Texas Securities Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1933
  4. El Paso Bitulithic Co. v. NeillCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924
  5. Crazy Water Co. v. CookCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API