Legal Opinion
In re Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railroad
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided September 28, 1987No. 85-2579PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
HARLINGTON WOOD, Jr., Circuit Judge.
The United States appeals from an order of the district court approving a plan of reorganization for a railroad. The government, as a creditor for railroad retirement taxes, contends that the plan of reorganization does not provide for an appropriate rate of interest to be paid on the taxes that have been due the government since 1977. The government takes the position that it is entitled to interest at the rates determined under the Internal Revenue Code, 26 U.S.C. §§ 6621 & 6622 (Supp.1986), and not at the rate of 7.5/8.5 percent determined by the…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Vanston Bondholders Protective Committee v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Nathanson v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Group of Institutional Investors v. Chicago, M., St. P. & P.R. Co., and 9 Other CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Sampsell v. Imperial Paper & Color Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- City of New York v. SaperSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- In the Matter of Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railroad Company, Debtor. Appeal of United States of America, Soo Line Railroad, Intervening-RespondentCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987