Legal Opinion

Hameed v. Rotker

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 27, 1984PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (1) in effect, to prohibit respondent from commencing a second retrial of petitioners under indictment No. 1493/81, and (2) for dismissal of the said indictment. Proceeding dismissed, without costs or disbursements. Notwithstanding the fact that the trial court had delivered an Allen charge {Allen v United States, 164 US 492) three hours prior to its declaration of a mistrial, it was not bound to substitute an available alternate, pursuant to CPL 270.35, when one juror was unable to continue deliberations. Because the jury had been deliberating for seven…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Allen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  2. Arizona v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Legal Aid Society of Sullivan County, Inc. v. ScheinmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  4. Gori v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  5. MATTER OF STATE OF NY v. KingNew York Court of Appeals · 1975

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hameed v. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
  2. People v. AndinoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  3. Leisenring v. CastellinoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  4. Hameed v. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API