Legal Opinion
Hull v. North Adams Hoosac Savings Bank
Massachusetts Appeals Court
Decided June 27, 2000No. 98-P-1049PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKass, J.
In the face of an imminent mortgage foreclosure sale on three properties, Kathleen A. Hull (Kathleen) brought an action against the mortgagee, North Adams Hoosac Savings Bank (bank). The complaint was filed on October 5, 1994, and the foreclosure sale took place November 16, 1994.
A copy of the complaint does not appear in Kathleen’s record appendix, and we are left to infer that the theory of her action was that the bank had acted unlawfully in demanding payment of a mortgage note on which Kathleen was not a signatory.1 The case was tried to a jury, which returned a verdict for Kathleen of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Mechanics National Bank of Worcester v. KilleenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
- McAvoy v. ShufrinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1988
- Kunen v. First Agricultural National BankMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1978
- O'SHAUGHNESSY v. BesseMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1979
- Finn v. McNeilMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1987
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Anderson v. Peter Pan Bus Lines, Inc.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2000
- Deranian v. 128 Sales, Inc.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2002
- Anderson v. Peter Pan Bus Lines, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2002