Legal Opinion

Sheriff v. Walsh

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided December 6, 1991No. 21675PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

On December 14, 1989, a grand jury was convened to determine whether respondents Ollie Walsh and Mathew Archuletta should be indicted on drug charges. The grand jury returned a true bill and on December 15, 1989, an indictment was filed charging respondents with one count of conspiracy to possess or sell a controlled substance and one count of trafficking in a controlled substance.

*844In Sheriff v. Marcum, 105 Nev. 824, 783 P.2d 1389 (1989), this court held that an accused must be given reasonable notice of the right to testify in front of a grand jury before that person may be indicted.…

3Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Barron v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Sheriff, Humboldt County v. MarcumNevada Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Bonnenfant v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Gier v. Ninth Judicial District CourtNevada Supreme Court · 1990

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by1 opinion

  1. Gordon v. PonticelloNevada Supreme Court · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API