Sheriff v. Walsh
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
On December 14, 1989, a grand jury was convened to determine whether respondents Ollie Walsh and Mathew Archuletta should be indicted on drug charges. The grand jury returned a true bill and on December 15, 1989, an indictment was filed charging respondents with one count of conspiracy to possess or sell a controlled substance and one count of trafficking in a controlled substance.
*844In Sheriff v. Marcum, 105 Nev. 824, 783 P.2d 1389 (1989), this court held that an accused must be given reasonable notice of the right to testify in front of a grand jury before that person may be indicted.…
3Cases cited8 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Barron v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1989
- Sheriff, Humboldt County v. MarcumNevada Supreme Court · 1989
- Bonnenfant v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1970
- Gier v. Ninth Judicial District CourtNevada Supreme Court · 1990
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by1 opinion
- Gordon v. PonticelloNevada Supreme Court · 1994