Legal Opinion

Farha v. City of Wichita

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 13, 2007No. 95,445PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Beier, J.:

In this appeal from a district court summary judgment in favor of defendant City of Wichita, the plaintiff class claims the City exceeded limitations on home rule power by assessing and collecting court costs in municipal cases.

Plaintiff class representative Michael A. Farha pursued this action as a result of his October 2001 conviction of inattentive driving in Wichita municipal court. He was fined $100 and assessed court costs of $73. He paid both and did not appeal. However, 3 months later, Farha filed this action on behalf of himself and…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Stovall v. Reliance InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 2005
  2. Claflin v. WalshSupreme Court of Kansas · 1973
  3. Rose v. via Christi Health System, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2003
  4. City of Junction City v. GriffinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1980
  5. Executive Aircraft Consulting, Inc. v. City of NewtonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1993

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Miller v. Westport Ins. Corp.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2009
  2. Taylor Wofford v. City of LaramieWyoming Supreme Court · 2016
  3. Heartland Apartment Ass'n, Inc. v. City of MissionCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2015
  4. Attorney General Opinion No., Kansas Attorney General Reports2009
  5. Heartland Apartment Ass'n v. City of MissionSupreme Court of Kansas · 2017

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API