Legal Opinion

Kiczuk v. United States

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided January 11, 2022No. 3:21-cv-00707Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT DIANE KICZUK, : Plaintiff, : : v. : No. 3:21-CV-707 (KAD) : : UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, : Defendant. : __________________________________________: RULING ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO QUASH SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM 1. The Factual and Procedural Background On May 24, 2021, plaintiff Diane Kiczuk (hereinafter, the “plaintiff”) brought this action against the United States of America (hereinafter, the “defendant”) in which plaintiff seeks refunds of alleged overpayments to the defendant of federal income tax in certain tax years. Doc. No. 1. The crux…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Oppenheimer Fund, Inc. v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Matson v. BD. OF EDUC., CITY SCHOOL DIST. OF NYCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
  3. John Doe, a Septa Employee v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority (Septa), and Judith Pierce, Individually and in Her Official CapacityCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
  4. William A. Rutter v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
  5. Take v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1984

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API