Legal Opinion

Giaimo v. Vitale

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 20, 2012PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

*524Valuation of closely held corporations is not an exact science, and it is the “particular facts and circumstances” of each case that will dictate the result (Matter of Friedman v Beway Realty Corp., 87 NY2d 161, 167 [1995]).

Here, the motion court correctly held that the method of valuing a closely held corporation should include any risk associated with the illiquidity of the shares (see Matter of Seagroatt Floral Co. [Riccardi], 78 NY2d 439, 445-446 [1991]). It also properly rejected petitioner’s contention that this Court’s decision in Vick v Albert (47 AD3d 482 [1st Dept 2008], lv denied…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Matter of Seagroatt Floral Co. Inc.(riccardi)New York Court of Appeals · 1991
  2. Friedman v. Beway Realty Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1995
  3. Manufacturer's & Traders Trust Co. v. Reliance InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 2007
  4. 317 W. 87 Assocaites v. DannenbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  5. Wechsler v. WechslerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Rosenblum v. TreitlerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API