Giaimo v. Vitale
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
*524Valuation of closely held corporations is not an exact science, and it is the “particular facts and circumstances” of each case that will dictate the result (Matter of Friedman v Beway Realty Corp., 87 NY2d 161, 167 [1995]).
Here, the motion court correctly held that the method of valuing a closely held corporation should include any risk associated with the illiquidity of the shares (see Matter of Seagroatt Floral Co. [Riccardi], 78 NY2d 439, 445-446 [1991]). It also properly rejected petitioner’s contention that this Court’s decision in Vick v Albert (47 AD3d 482 [1st Dept 2008], lv denied…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Matter of Seagroatt Floral Co. Inc.(riccardi)New York Court of Appeals · 1991
- Friedman v. Beway Realty Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1995
- Manufacturer's & Traders Trust Co. v. Reliance InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 2007
- 317 W. 87 Assocaites v. DannenbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Wechsler v. WechslerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Rosenblum v. TreitlerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2025