Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Newport Realty, Inc. v. Lynch

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided July 20, 2005No. 2003-363-AppealPublished

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partFlaherty, Justice

I completely agree with the majority with respect to its holding on the standing of the Attorney General, acting on behalf of the citizens of Rhode Island.

However, I respectfully dissent from that portion of the majority opinion which holds that there was an incipient dedication of the wharves in question to public use. I do so because I believe that the majority misinterprets the law applicable to the facts and circumstances of this case and substitutes its judgment for that of the trial justice in a manner contrary to our well-settled standard of review.

As an initial matter, I have…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Morinville v. MorinvilleSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1976
  2. Rodriques v. SantosSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1983
  3. Harris v. Town of LincolnSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1995
  4. Donnelly v. CowsillSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1998
  5. Robidoux v. PelletierSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1978

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API