Legal Opinion

Cartwright v. Flatt

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 28, 1951No. 2978PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TIREY, Justice.

H. T. 'Cartwright brought this suit against J. W. Flatt, J. E. Roten and W. E. Henderson. His suit against Flatt was based on the unpaid balance on a promissory note in the principal sum of $1,468.13, executed by Flatt and his wife to him and secured by chattel mortgage on the 1949 cotton crop of Flatt. He sought recovery against Roten and Henderson for conversion of the cotton covered by said chattel mortgage. He did not ask for foreclosure of his mortgage. The court overruled Cartwright’s motion for instructed verdict

The jury in its verdict found substantially (1) that at the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Oats v. Dublin National BankTexas Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Harding v. San Saba Nat. BankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929
  3. Coleman Production Credit Ass'n v. MahanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1943
  4. Knight v. BartonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
  5. Hodge v. FlyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Conoco, Inc. v. Amarillo National Bank, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1997
  2. First National Bank of Mission v. ThomasTexas Supreme Court · 1966
  3. First National Bank of Mission v. ThomasTexas Supreme Court · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API