Legal Opinion

Rolland v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided August 3, 2006No. 49A02-0508-CR-712PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SULLIVAN, Judge.

Following a jury trial, Appellant, Richard Rolland, was convicted of two counts of Theft as Class D felonies 1 and one count of Fraud on a Financial Institution as a Class C felony 2 Upon appeal, Rolland presents the following issues for our review: (1) whether the trial court abused its discretion in admitting into evidence a document under Indiana Evidence Rule 803(6), the business records exception to the hearsay rule, and (2) whether the evidence on the issue of identification is sufficient to support his convictions.

We affirm.

Louise Rehse owns a home in…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Dill v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Shepherd v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1997
  3. Payne v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1995
  4. Belcher v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Jennings v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2000

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Speybroeck v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007
  2. Antonio L. Vaughn v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2014
  3. Mary Barrix and Joe Barrix, Jr. v. Kristopher Jackson and Graves Plumbing Co. Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2012
  4. Houston v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2011
  5. William C. Williams v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2016

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API