Legal Opinion · Dissent

Hovas Construction, Inc. v. Board of Trustees

Court of Appeals of Mississippi

Decided September 4, 2012No. 2010-CA-01755-COAPublished

1DissentGriffis, P.J.

¶ 25. This case requires the interpretation of a liquidated-damages clause in a construction contract. The School District contends that because Hovas was thirty-nine days late in substantial completion, it was entitled to deduct $19,500 as liquidated damages from the balance of the construction price due Hovas under the construction contract. Hovas argues that (1) any delay was not due to its fault, but was due to the late delivery of the steel building parts, the material having been timely ordered by Hovas; (2) the liquidated-damages provision in the contract is not a reasonable…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Shields v. EarlyMississippi Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Massman Const. Co. v. City Council of Greenville, Miss.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1945
  3. Vanlandingham v. JenkinsMississippi Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Ruckelshaus v. Broward County School BoardCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
  5. Board of Trustees of State Institutions of Higher Learning v. Elbert Homer Wood, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API