Legal Opinion
Dee v. Becker
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided June 23, 1994No. 49A02-9308-CV-446PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KIRSCH, Judge.
Michelle and Pamela Dee appeal from the trial court’s denial of their request for a new trial following a favorable jury verdict on their personal injury complaint. The jury awarded Michelle $6,000 in damages, but Pamela was awarded nothing. We affirm the judgment as to Michelle, but reverse the judgment as to Pamela and remand for a new trial.
ISSUE
We restate the issue for our review as whether the jury’s award of damages was inadequate as a matter of law.
FACTS
Michelle and Pamela Dee filed a negligence action against Michael Becker for damages resulting from a collision between…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Kavanagh v. ButoracIndiana Court of Appeals · 1966
- Rondinelli v. BowdenIndiana Court of Appeals · 1973
- Scott County School District One v. Asher Ex Rel. McClureIndiana Supreme Court · 1975
- State v. Church of Nazarene of LogansportIndiana Supreme Court · 1978
- McNall v. Farmers Insurance GroupIndiana Court of Appeals · 1979
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Clary v. Lite MacHines Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2006
- Johnston v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceIndiana Court of Appeals · 1996
- Sibbing v. CaveIndiana Supreme Court · 2010
- City of Carmel v. Leeper Electric Services, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2004
- Childress v. BucklerIndiana Court of Appeals · 2002
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.