Legal Opinion

(PC) Barrios v. Torres

District Court, E.D. California

Decided March 29, 2023No. 1:20-cv-01234Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 FRANKLIN BARRIOS, Case No. 1:20-cv-01234-ADA-CDB (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S 13 v. MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT 14 TORRES, et al., (Doc. 25) 15 Defendants. 16 17 Franklin Barrios is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action 18 pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 19 I. RELEVANT BACKGROUND 20 Plaintiff initiated this action with the filing of his original complaint on September 1, 21 2020. (Doc. 1.) 22 In its First Screening Order…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Michael Lacey v. Joseph ArpaioCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  2. Coleman v. Quaker Oats Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  3. Coughlin v. RogersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
  4. Desert Empire Bank, Etc. v. Insurance Co. Of North America, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
  5. Ellis v. City of San DiegoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API