Karpenko v. City of Southfield
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtM. J. Kelly, J.
The issue is whether the notice provisions of the zoning enabling act, MCLA 125.584; MSA 5.2934, are unconstitutional as viola-tive of due process and equal protection.
Plaintiffs brought this action on June 28, 1976 seeking damages and to restrain defendants from constructing a nine-story dormitory on land of defendant Lawrence Institute of Technology. Plaintiffs asked the trial court to find unconstitutional a certain Southfield zoning ordinance amendment which rezoned the property in question from single family residential to educational, research and office. Plaintiffs also asked that…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Manistee Bank & Trust Co. v. McGowanMichigan Supreme Court · 1975
- Alan v. Wayne CountyMichigan Supreme Court · 1972
- Dow v. State of MichiganMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
- Ridenour v. County of BayMichigan Supreme Court · 1962
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Jayno Heights Landowners Ass'n v. PrestonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1978
- Jayno Heights Landowners Ass'n v. PrestonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1978