Legal Opinion

Karpenko v. City of Southfield

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided April 19, 1977No. Docket 29509PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtM. J. Kelly, J.

The issue is whether the notice provisions of the zoning enabling act, MCLA 125.584; MSA 5.2934, are unconstitutional as viola-tive of due process and equal protection.

Plaintiffs brought this action on June 28, 1976 seeking damages and to restrain defendants from constructing a nine-story dormitory on land of defendant Lawrence Institute of Technology. Plaintiffs asked the trial court to find unconstitutional a certain Southfield zoning ordinance amendment which rezoned the property in question from single family residential to educational, research and office. Plaintiffs also asked that…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Manistee Bank & Trust Co. v. McGowanMichigan Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Alan v. Wayne CountyMichigan Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Dow v. State of MichiganMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Ridenour v. County of BayMichigan Supreme Court · 1962

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Jayno Heights Landowners Ass'n v. PrestonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1978
  2. Jayno Heights Landowners Ass'n v. PrestonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API