In Re Bostwick
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
BY THE COURT
1. The statute under which the proceeding was brought violates no provision of tho State Constitution. On the contrary its provisions are in indirect response to the mandate imposed by §6, Article IV, of the amendments of 1912. That amendment imposed upon the legislature the duty of passing laws for the prompt removal of public officers for misconduct involving moral turptitude or for such other causes as the legislature might prescribe. The constitutional provision does not require that the moral turpitude for such removal to be had shall be evidenced by an official act. The…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Vogel v. GruazSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Moore v. StricklingWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1899
- Michael v. MatsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1909
- State v. WilcoxSupreme Court of Kansas · 1913
- Wadsworth v. ParsonsOhio Supreme Court · 1834
3Cited by5 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Gremillion v. O'HARASupreme Court of Louisiana · 1968
- State v. BissantzOhio Court of Appeals · 1982
- In Re Removal of PickeringOhio Court of Appeals · 1970
- Brown v. WetheringtonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1983
- State Ex Rel. Gremillion v. O'HARASupreme Court of Louisiana · 1968