Legal Opinion

Wetzstein v. Boston & Montana Consolidated Copper & Silver Mining Co.

Montana Supreme Court

Decided March 11, 1901No. 1,658PublishedCited by 22 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Silver Bow County; William Clancy, Judge. Action by Adolph Wetzstein against the Boston & Montana Consolidated Copper & Silver Mining Company. Order restraining defendant, and it appeals, and petitions for an order of supersedeas.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Milburn

This cause conies now before this Court upon the petition of the defendant for an order of supersedeas staying a certain restraining order issued by the district court on February 18, 1901, pending a hearing of an order to show cause, on April 2, 1901, why a temporary injunction may not issue enjoining the defendant from continuing certain work in and about the Comanche lode claim. On the 25th day of February, 1901, the defendant appealed from the order so restraining the defendant pending-the healing on the order to show cause why a temporary injunction should not issue.

Respondent contends…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hicks v. MichaelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
  2. San Diego Water Co. v. Pac. Coast S.S. Co.California Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Bennett Bros. v. CongdonMontana Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Strickland v. GriffinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1883
  5. Butte & Boston Consolidated Mining Co. v. Montana Ore Purchasing Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1900

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Sheridan County Electric Co-Op., Inc. v. FergusonMontana Supreme Court · 1951
  2. King v. Pony Gold Mining Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Labbitt v. BunstonMontana Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Mississippi State Bar Ass'n v. WadeMississippi Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Pack v. CarterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1915

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API