Legal Opinion

In re Merritt

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided September 12, 2003No. 02-306PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

¶ 1. Plaintiffs Dexter and Susan Merritt appeal from a decision of the Environmental Board sustaining a jurisdictional opinion that Act 250 applied to a five-lot subdivision that they sold at public auction. On appeal, plaintiffs argue that the Environmental Board erred because: (1) the jurisdictional opinions were issued sua sponte by district environmental coordinators in violation of our holding in In re Vt. Verde Antique Int% Inc., 174 Vt. 208, 811 A.2d 181 (2002); and (2) plaintiffs *625were not required to obtain an Act 250 permit under the plain language of 10 V.S.A.§ 6001a. We affirm.

¶ 2.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In Re WhiteSupreme Court of Vermont · 2001
  2. In Re Vermont Verde Antique International, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2002

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Rogers v. ParrishSupreme Court of Vermont · 2007
  2. In re Musty PermitSupreme Court of Vermont · 2012
  3. Hamm Mine Act 250 JurisdictionVermont Superior Court · 2008
  4. Hamm Mine Reclamation Act 250 JO 2-241Vermont Superior Court · 2007
  5. In Re Guardianship of Virginia Black (Elizabeth Black & Jonathan Black, Appellants)Supreme Court of Vermont · 2023

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API