In re Merritt
Supreme Court of Vermont
1Opinion of the Court
¶ 1. Plaintiffs Dexter and Susan Merritt appeal from a decision of the Environmental Board sustaining a jurisdictional opinion that Act 250 applied to a five-lot subdivision that they sold at public auction. On appeal, plaintiffs argue that the Environmental Board erred because: (1) the jurisdictional opinions were issued sua sponte by district environmental coordinators in violation of our holding in In re Vt. Verde Antique Int% Inc., 174 Vt. 208, 811 A.2d 181 (2002); and (2) plaintiffs *625were not required to obtain an Act 250 permit under the plain language of 10 V.S.A.§ 6001a. We affirm.
¶ 2.…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- In Re WhiteSupreme Court of Vermont · 2001
- In Re Vermont Verde Antique International, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2002
3Cited by7 opinions
- Rogers v. ParrishSupreme Court of Vermont · 2007
- In re Musty PermitSupreme Court of Vermont · 2012
- Hamm Mine Act 250 JurisdictionVermont Superior Court · 2008
- Hamm Mine Reclamation Act 250 JO 2-241Vermont Superior Court · 2007
- In Re Guardianship of Virginia Black (Elizabeth Black & Jonathan Black, Appellants)Supreme Court of Vermont · 2023
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.