Legal Opinion
Likins-Foster Monterey Corporation, a Delaware Corporation, and Likins-Foster Ord Corporation, a Delaware Corporation v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 1, 1962No. 17218, 17956PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HAMLEY, Circuit Judge.
In this suit by the United States to condemn two Wherry housing projects at Fort Ord, California, the testimony as to value ranged from $650,000 to $3,880,-000. The jury returned a verdict of $1,-106,000 and judgment in that sum was entered. The two condemnees, jointly referred to herein as Likins-Foster, appealed. 1
This court thereafter remanded the cause to the district court for the purpose of permitting it to consider a motion, made by Likins-Foster, to vacate the .judgment and grant a new trial. The •district court denied the motion and Likins-Foster filed a second…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Kimball Laundry Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- United States v. Honolulu Plantation Co. Honolulu Plantation Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1950
- United States v. Benning Housing Corporation, and Unknown OwnersCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1960
- Buena Vista Homes, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1960
- Fairfield Gardens, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Don Brown, Josef H. Miller and Allen L. McAlear v. Avemco Investment CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
- The Sill Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1965
- In Re Crozier Bros., Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1986
- Likins-Foster Honolulu Corp. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1969
- United States v. Artemio Arthur AngeliniCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.