Legal Opinion
(PC)Shannon v. Gudino
District Court, E.D. California
Decided November 22, 2022No. 2:22-cv-01065Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 SETH PETER SHANNON, No. 2:22-cv-01065-CKD P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 H. GUDINO, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff is a county inmate proceeding pro se and seeking relief pursuant to
42 U.S.C. § 18
1983. This proceeding was referred to this court by Local Rule 302 pursuant to
28 U.S.C. § 19
636(b)(1). 20 Plaintiff requests leave to proceed in forma pauperis. As plaintiff has submitted a 21 declaration that makes the showing required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a), his request will be granted. 22 Plaintiff…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.