Legal Opinion

B. B. Noyes Co. v. Ballard

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided September 18, 1925PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRugg, C.J.

The defendant, apparently within the time allowed by an order of extension, filed a bill of exceptions on September 5, 1922. The plaintiff filed a motion to dismiss the exceptions on September 16, 1922. The judge declined to pass upon this motion. It may be assumed that this was equivalent to a denial of the motion. John Hetherington & Sons, Ltd. v. William Firth Co. 210 Mass. 8,18,19. The case comes before us by report, which begins with these prefatory words, “justice requires that this case be reported and considering the engagements and health of the court it has been reported within a…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Moss v. Old Colony Trust Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1923
  2. John Hetherington & Sons, Ltd. v. William Firth Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
  3. Leland v. Order of United Commercial Travelers of AmericaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1919
  4. City of Boston v. TurnerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
  5. Andrews v. Tuttle-Smith Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1906

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Milbank v. J. C. Littlefield, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
  2. Granger v. LovelyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
  3. Moore v. Town of AmesburyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
  4. American Fireworks Co. v. MorrisonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
  5. Bennett v. BrowneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API