Legal Opinion

Stolove v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.

New York Supreme Court

Decided September 14, 1935PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTaylor, J.

Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment (Rules Civ. Prac. rule 113) is denied; and defendant’s cross-motion for like relief is granted, and plaintiff’s complaint is dismissed upon the merits, but without costs either of the motion or of the action. My reasons are; The relevant facts are undisputed. Upon those facts, as a matter of law, when the defendant paid to the Myrtle Henion estate the total sum of $11,811.21, in full of a judgment for $11,118.04 for damages, interest and costs (recovered before the Stolove judgments) and a judgment for the costs of affirmance, $101.90, each with…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Lavine v. Indemnity Insurance Co. of North AmericaNew York Court of Appeals · 1933
  2. Bleimeyer v. Public Service Mutual Casualty InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1929

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Alford v. Textile Insurance CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
  2. David v. BaumanNew York Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Pisciotta v. PrestonNew York Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Gerdes v. Travelers InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1981
  5. O'Dwyer v. Grove Service Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1958

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API