Legal Opinion

Hawkins v. George Ringler & Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 15, 1900PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal by the defendant, George Ringler & Co., from a judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the plaintiffs, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Kings on the 7th day of March, 1899, upon the verdict of a jury, and also from an order entered in said clerk’s office on the 2d day of March, 1899, denying the defendant’s motion for a new trial made upon the minutes.

1Opinion of the Court

Goodrich, P. J:

The plaintiffs bring this action to recover the rent of premises No. 36 Sixth avenue in the former city of New York, from June, 1897,. to January, 1898, inclusive, and for the amount of repairs made to he premises, the-action being based on a lease made in 1891 by the plaintiffs’ testator to the defendant corporation for the term of five years, ending May 1, 1897. The defendant, on the day of the date of the lease, sublet the premises to Thomas J. and James T. Wallace' for the same term. The Wallaces went into possession and occupied the premises until May 2, 1898, when the…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. City of New York v. McCarthyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1916
  2. Mayfair Merchandise Co., Inc., Debtor-Appellee v. Cathryn WayneCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969
  3. Devine v. KilcommonsNew York Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Devine v. KilcommonsAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1910
  5. Snowhill v. Diamond Plate Glass Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1906

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API