Legal Opinion

Skidmore v. Czapiga

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided April 18, 1978No. Docket 77-1685PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

D. E. Holbrook, Jr., J.

The instant appeal arises from a non-jury paternity suit following which the trial court entered an order of filiation.

During the course of trial the defendant attempted to present the testimony of three witnesses tending to establish the defense of "alibi”. Following objection by the prosecutor, the trial court ruled such evidence to be inadmissible since defendant had not complied with the notice requirement of the "alibi” statute. MCLA 768.20; MSA 28.1043.

In People v McFadden, 347 Mich 357; 79 NW2d 869 (1956), the Supreme Court held that notice of alibi was required…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Palmer v. State Land Office BoardMichigan Supreme Court · 1943
  2. People v. McFaddenMichigan Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Reichert v. Peoples State Bank for SavingsMichigan Supreme Court · 1934

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. People v. RosecrantsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1979
  2. Pryber v. Marriott CorporationMichigan Court of Appeals · 1980
  3. Bowerman v. MacDonaldMichigan Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Elmore v. EllisMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982
  5. Pecoraro v. Department of CorrectionsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1980

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API