Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Pittsburgh Electrical Insulation Co.

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 20, 1977No. Appeal, No. 337 C.D. 1976PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Menceb,

This appeal has been taken from an order of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Board) which affirmed the referee’s grant of the petition of Hermine Fencik (claimant) for further medical services. The employer, Pittsburgh Electrical Insulation Company, and its insurance carrier, Aetna Casualty and Surety Company, have argued here that there was not sufficient competent evidence in the record to justify the granting of the petition. We disagree and affirm.

In 1966, the claimant injured her back in the course of her employment. Agreements were entered into between the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board v. QuickCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  2. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board v. Host Motel of Wilkes-Barre, Inc.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  2. Felmont Oil Corp. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API