Legal Opinion

Mutual Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Savings & Loan Advisory Committee

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided April 9, 1968PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHallows, C. J.

On this appeal Mutual raises several questions which are best determined seriatim.

I

Does the one mile limitation in sec. 215.13 (39) (b), Stats., apply?

While there is a distinction between the absorption of one savings and loan association by another and the consolidation of savings and loan associations, they are treated alike in respect to a possible resulting branch office. Absorptions are governed .by sec. 215.27, Stats., which requires the affirmative vote of at least two thirds of the board of directors of each association. All the assets of the absorbed association are transferred to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Neelen v. LucasWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Town of Ashwaubenon v. State Highway CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
  3. City of Milwaukee v. Sewerage CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Olson v. State Conservation CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1940
  5. State ex rel. Thieme v. GregoryWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. ClarkNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Board of Regents of University of Wisconsin System v. MussallemWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Town of Menominee v. SkubitzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Huff & Morse, Inc. v. RiordonCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1984
  5. Mutual Fed. S&L Asso. v. Sav. & L. Adv. Comm.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1968

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API