Legal Opinion

Huff & Morse, Inc. v. Riordon

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided February 1, 1984No. 83-155PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, P.J.

Frank Riordon appeals from the trial court’s decision that he owes $1,504.94 to Huff and Morse, Inc., a service station and auto repair shop in Delavan. Riordon claims that the shop cannot collect for repairs to his 1970 Ford truck because it failed to comply with the written estimate requirement in Wis. Adm. Code, ch. Ag 132. He also makes a similar argument regarding repairs to his 1974 Pontiac. We hold the shop did indeed fail to comply with the requirement. As such, the underlying contracts are invalid as a matter of law. We also hold, however, that because the record indicates Riordon…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Wisconsin's Environmental Decade, Inc. v. Department of Natural ResourcesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Cogswell v. Robertshaw Controls Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
  3. In Re Estate of HaeseWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Beal v. First Fed. Sav. & Loan Asso. of MadisonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
  5. State Ex Rel. Melentowich v. KlinkWisconsin Supreme Court · 1982

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Baierl v. McTaggartWisconsin Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Moonlight v. BoyceCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1985
  3. Henry v. General Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1999
  4. Staples Ex Rel. Staples v. YoungCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1987
  5. State Ex Rel. Staples v. Department of Health & Social ServicesCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1987

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API