Legal Opinion
William D. v. Rohl
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 27, 1989PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to prohibit the respondent Justice of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, from enforcing his order dated December 14, 1988, which directed the petitioner "to permit pubic and head hair samples to be taken by a certified physician’s assistant and examined by the Suffolk County Criminalistics Laboratory for analysis”.
Adjudged that the petition is granted, without costs or disbursements, and the respondent Justice of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, is prohibited from enforcing his order dated December 14, 1988.
The petitioner and his wife were married in…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- In re of an Investigation into the Death of Jon L.New York Court of Appeals · 1982
- Barber v. RubinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
- David M. v. DwyerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- Brown v. MonserrateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
3Cited by7 opinions
- Anonymous v. CacciabaudoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Valdes v. DeRosaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Ford v. VaughanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- People v. King, New York County Courts1994
- Thomas v. NelsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.