Legal Opinion

Nieuwendaal v. Missouri Department of Corrections

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided November 1, 2005No. WD 65245PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PAUL M. SPINDEN, Presiding Judge.

The Department of Corrections appeals the circuit court’s judgment granting David E. Nieuwendaal’s pro se petition for declaratory judgment. The circuit court determined that, pursuant to Section 559.115.7, RSMo Supp.2004, the department should not consider Nieuwendaal’s prior 120-day incarceration as a prior prison commitment for the purpose of calculating his minimum prison term under Section 558.019, RSMo Supp.2004. We agree and affirm the circuit court’s judgment.

Nieuwendaal committed the offenses of first degree tampering, stealing, and receiving stolen…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co. v. BuderSupreme Court of Missouri · 1974
  2. State v. JacoSupreme Court of Missouri · 2005
  3. Irvin v. KempkerMissouri Court of Appeals · 2004
  4. State Ex Rel. Nixon v. RussellSupreme Court of Missouri · 2004
  5. Powell v. Missouri Department of CorrectionsMissouri Court of Appeals · 2004

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of HaydenMissouri Court of Appeals · 2008
  2. Talley v. Missouri Department of CorrectionsMissouri Court of Appeals · 2006
  3. Carlyle v. Missouri Department of CorrectionsMissouri Court of Appeals · 2005
  4. Canale v. Department of CorrectionsMissouri Court of Appeals · 2006
  5. Gilles v. Missouri Department of CorrectionsMissouri Court of Appeals · 2006

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API