Legal Opinion

Jamail v. Thomas

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 20, 1972No. 15882PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BELL, Chief Justice.

Appellant, an attorney, filed suit against appellees, Aetna Life & Casualty Company, Norman Chersky, Ronald Easley and James Richard Thomas, to recover damages for tortious interference with a contract of employment. The court, based on a jury verdict, rendered a judgment that appellant take nothing. Easley and Chersky were claim adjusters for Aetna.

On September 15, 1968, an automobile driven by James Richard Thomas hit the automobile owned and driven by Tommy Cochran. There was a rear end collision. The Cochrans’ automobile was also occupied by Mrs. Cochran and a small…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Arnold v. LeonardTexas Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Franco v. GrahamCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1971
  3. Taylor v. Gilbert Gertner EnterprisesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1971
  4. Allen v. Corn Exchange BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
  5. Kirkpatrick v. HurstCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1971

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Rourke v. GarzaTexas Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Whittlesey v. MillerTexas Supreme Court · 1978
  3. K.B. v. N.B.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1991
  4. Motel Enterprises, Inc. v. Nobani, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1990
  5. City of San Antonio v. Aguilar, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1984

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API