Legal Opinion
Adam Benns v. Continental Casualty Company
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided January 5, 1993No. 91-2058PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FLOYD R. GIBSON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Adam Benns appeals the district court’s entry of summary judgment in favor of Continental Casualty Company (“Continental”) on his claims of breach of contract and bad faith refusal to pay insurance benefits. We affirm.
I. BACKGROUND
In April 1988, Benns was injured in an automobile accident with an unknown driver; at the time, Benns was driving a vehicle owned by his employer. Benns owned a different vehicle, a Chevrolet Blazer, which was insured under a policy issued by Continental. The policy was issued to two companies owned by Benns’ father: Benns…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- King v. Nationwide InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- Chavez v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1975
- Bartlett v. Nationwide Mutual Ins.Ohio Supreme Court · 1973
- Knowles v. United Services Automobile Ass'nNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1992
- Farmers Alliance Mutual Insurance Company v. Mary Bakke, Johnny Bakke, Jo Lynn Wood, Karla Vigil and Lawrence VigilCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1980
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Grynberg v. Koch Gateway Pipeline Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
- American Economy Insurance Co. v. BogdahnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2004
- Reeder v. American Economy InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
- Lunge v. National Casualty Co.District Court, D. Vermont · 1997
- Miller v. Monumental Life InsuranceDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2005
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.