Kozerski v. Smith
District Court, D. New Hampshire
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
DEVINE, Chief Judge.
Pro se petitioner has filed this petition for habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 challenging the validity of the conviction and sentence of incarceration imposed upon him by the Keene (New Hampshire) District Court. Petitioner alleges thát he was denied his right to a trial de novo of his traffic conviction in the Cheshire County Superior Court due to indigency. Petitioner further alleges that he has been unable to pay the fine imposed by the Keene District Court due to indigency and that he has been ordered to serve a term of incarceration, at the rate of…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Wainwright v. SykesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Rose v. LundySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Picard v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Bounds v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Townsend v. SainSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. MorrillSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1983