Legal Opinion
Garraghty v. Virginia
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided May 9, 1995No. 94-1870PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded by published opinion. Judge MOTZ wrote the opinion, in which Chief Judge ERVIN and Judge MURNAGHAN joined.
OPINION
MOTZ, Circuit Judge:
The district court denied various state officials qualified immunity for their role in discharging a warden, without affording him the benefits of the state grievance procedure or any hearing that included the right to confront and examine witnesses. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand for further proceedings.
I
David A. Garraghty began employment with the Commonwealth of Virginia, Department of…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Garcia Jay Wright v. George Collins, Warden, Maryland Penitentiary Dr. Berry Officer Larry DonnellCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1985
- Bishop v. WoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Atherton v. District of Columbia Office of the MayorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2009
- Washington Teachers' Union Local 6, American Federation of Teachers, Afl-Cio v. The Board of Education of the District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
- Case v. Shelby County Civil Service Merit BoardCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2002
- Garraghty v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1995
- Jackson v. LongCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1996
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.