Legal Opinion

Londrico v. Delores C. Knowlton, Inc.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided June 16, 1993No. 15900PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Cook, Presiding Judge.

John and Emily Akerstrom (“Akerstroms”) listed their house for sale in March 1992. John and Domenico Petitti (“Petittis”) made an offer to purchase the house, which the Akerstroms accepted (“Petittis-Akerstroms contract”). While Petittis awaited approval of their financing, Rose M. Londrico (“Londrico”) made a backup offer contingent upon the failure of the Petittis to obtain financing, which the Akerstroms accepted (“Londrico-Akerstroms contract”). In May, the Petittis signed and delivered a release of the Petittis-Akerstroms contract. The Petittis then forthwith…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. American Trucking Associations, Inc. v. Frisco Transportation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
  2. Blanton v. AnzaloneCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  3. Merry Queen Transfer Corp. v. O'RourkeDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1967
  4. Dentsply International, Inc. v. KostasOhio Court of Appeals · 1985
  5. Cale Products, Inc. v. Orrville Bronze & Aluminum Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1982

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. State v. MillerOhio Supreme Court · 2010
  2. State ex rel. Litty v. LeskovyanskyOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  3. State v. PerkinsOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
  4. Blust v. Lamar Advertising of Mobile, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2009
  5. Ginn v. Stonecreek Dental CareOhio Court of Appeals · 2019

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API