Legal Opinion

In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of Proceedings of Hammer

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided March 15, 1916PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Proceedings oil the judicial settlement of an administrator’s account.

1Opinion of the Court

Schulz, S.—

Since the publication of the opinion- of this court in Matter of Hammer (Molino Estate), ante, 36, schedule 0 of this account there referred to has been amended on consent, and with- the stipulation that the objections theretofore filed be considered amended so .as to except to the' allowance in said amended schedule C for stenography and typewriting “ as not being a proper charge against the funds in this estate.”

The matter presents the question whether the public administrator of Bronx county is -entitled to charge against an estate of which he is administrator the reasonable…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In Re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of NesmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
  2. Merritt v. MerrittAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898
  3. In re the Judicial Settlement of the Accounts of the Binghamton Trust Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
  4. Wells v. DisbrowNew York Supreme Court · 1892
  5. People ex rel. McDonnell v. PrendergastAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1915

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Estate Bernice P. BishopHawaii Supreme Court · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API