Legal Opinion

Teitsworth v. Kempski

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided December 10, 1956No. 29PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bramhall, J.:

The questions presented here relate (1) to the consideration by the trial judge of evidence offered by defendant to prove the damage to plaintiffs’ automobile by showing the estimated cost of repairs; (2) to the right of plaintiffs to recover damage for loss of use where they prove their damage by the depreciated market value of the vehicle; and, (3) to the admissibility of certain evidence by which an attempt was made to mitigate plaintiffs’ damage.

On December 30, 1954, plaintiffs’ automobile, a 1954 Dodge, in good condition, while parked in front of the grocery store of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Newman v. BROWNSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1955
  2. Morgan Millwork Co. v. Dover Garage Co.Superior Court of Delaware · 1919
  3. Littlejohn v. ElionskySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1944
  4. Garrett v. Peoples Railway Co.Superior Court of Delaware · 1906
  5. Stidham v. Mayor & CommissionersSuperior Court of Delaware · 1907

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Storey v. CastnerSupreme Court of Delaware · 1973
  2. Taylor v. KingCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1965
  3. Alber v. WiseSupreme Court of Delaware · 1960
  4. Stuart v. RizzoSupreme Court of Delaware · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API