Legal Opinion
Dancy v. Daggett
Texas Supreme Court
Decided September 18, 1991No. D-1069PublishedCited by 53 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ON MOTION FOR REHEARING
2Per curiam
We grant Relator’s motion for rehearing and issue the following opinion.
Leonard Dancy seeks mandamus relief from temporary orders issued in his divorce proceeding. We conditionally grant the requested relief.
The 310th Judicial District Court, Dag-gett, J., set a hearing on temporary orders in Dancy’s divorce action for April 16,1991. After that setting, Dancy’s counsel, Gerald Bourque, received notice of an April 16, 1991 hearing in federal court on a separate matter: a criminal case in which Bourque was the defendant’s counsel of record. Bo-urque promptly filed a…
3Cases cited3 opinions
- Johnson v. Fourth Court of AppealsTexas Supreme Court · 1985
- Crane v. TunksTexas Supreme Court · 1959
- Hooks v. Fourth Court of AppealsTexas Supreme Court · 1991
4Cited by53 opinions
- In the Interest of E.C.R., ChildTexas Supreme Court · 2013
- United States v. EmersonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001
- In Re DerzapfTexas Supreme Court · 2007
- Little v. DaggettTexas Supreme Court · 1993
- In Re Allen, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2012
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.